Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] System V Shared Memory for Open MPI: Request for Community Input and Testing
From: Samuel K. Gutierrez (samuel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-29 16:52:24


Hi Ethan,

Bummer. What does the following command show?

sysctl -a | grep shm

Thanks!

--
Samuel K. Gutierrez
Los Alamos National Laboratory
On Apr 29, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> I'm trying to run off your HG clone, but I'm seeing issues with
> c_hello, e.g.,
>
>  $ mpirun -mca mpi_common_sm sysv --mca btl self,sm,tcp --host burl- 
> ct-v440-2,burl-ct-v440-2 -np 2 ./c_hello
>   
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  A system call failed during shared memory initialization that should
>  not have.  It is likely that your MPI job will now either abort or
>  experience performance degradation.
>
>    Local host:  burl-ct-v440-2
>    System call: shmat(2)
>    Process:     [[43408,1],1]
>    Error:       Invalid argument (errno 22)
>   
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  ^Cmpirun: killing job...
>
>  $ uname -a
>  SunOS burl-ct-v440-2 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun- 
> Fire-V440
>
> The same test works okay if I s/sysv/mmap/.
>
> Regards,
> Ethan
>
>
> On Wed, Apr/28/2010 07:16:12AM, Samuel K. Gutierrez wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Faster component initialization/finalization times is one of the main
>> motivating factors of this work.  The general idea is to get away  
>> from
>> creating a rather large backing file.  With respect to module  
>> bandwidth and
>> latency, mmap and sysv seem to be comparable - at least that is  
>> what my
>> preliminary tests have shown.  As it stands, I have not come across a
>> situation where the mmap SM component doesn't work or is slower.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>>
>> --
>> Samuel K. Gutierrez
>> Los Alamos National Laboratory
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Samuel K. Gutierrez <samuel_at_[hidden] 
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>> With Jeff and Ralph's help, I have completed a System V shared  
>>>> memory
>>>> component for Open MPI.
>>>
>>> What is the motivation for this work ? Are there situations where  
>>> the
>>> mmap based SM component doesn't work or is slow(er) ?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel