I'm sure someone will object to a name, but the logic looks fine to me
On Feb 9, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>> While we're at it, why not call the option giving MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE support --enable-thread-multiple ?
>> Makes sense to me. I agree with Brian that we need three options here.
> Ok, how about these:
> --enable-opal-progress-threads: enables progress thread machinery in opal
> --enable-opal-multi-thread: enables multi threaded machinery in opal
> or perhaps --enable-opal-threads ?
> --enable-mpi-thread-multiple: enables the use of MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE; affects only the MPI layer
> directly implies --enable-opal-multi-thread
> Deprecated options
> --enable-mpi-threads: deprecated synonym for --enable-mpi-thread-multiple
> --enable-progress-threads: deprecated synonym for --enable-opal-progress-threads
> Jeff Squyres
> For corporate legal information go to:
> devel mailing list