Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Question about ompi_proc_t
From: George Bosilca (bosilca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-08 12:30:27


I have a better solution ;) Implemented in r22277.

  george.

On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:17 , Jeff Squyres wrote:

> On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:05 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
>> Both of these types (mca_pml_endpoint_t and mca_pml_base_endpoint_t) are meaningless, they can safely be replaced by void*. We have them clearly typed (but with just for the sake of understanding, so one can easily figure out what is supposed to be stored in this specific field. As such, we can remove one of them (mca_pml_base_endpoint_t) and use the other one (mca_pml_endpoint_t) everywhere.
>
> It would probably be good to put this in a comment somewhere in the code base. :-)
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel