Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] Question about ompi_proc_t
From: George Bosilca (bosilca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-08 12:30:27


I have a better solution ;) Implemented in r22277.

  george.

On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:17 , Jeff Squyres wrote:

> On Dec 8, 2009, at 12:05 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
>> Both of these types (mca_pml_endpoint_t and mca_pml_base_endpoint_t) are meaningless, they can safely be replaced by void*. We have them clearly typed (but with just for the sake of understanding, so one can easily figure out what is supposed to be stored in this specific field. As such, we can remove one of them (mca_pml_base_endpoint_t) and use the other one (mca_pml_endpoint_t) everywhere.
>
> It would probably be good to put this in a comment somewhere in the code base. :-)
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel