Somehow the mail below got queued up on my laptop and didn't get until
early this morning --- sorry for the apparent non-sequitur in the
thread.
I'll amend the ticket with what George said and I'll also add some
comments about why MPI_LOGICALx is defined in our header files so that
next time this topic comes up, there will at least be something to
reference. :-)
On Sep 26, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>
> > Disclaimer: I have almost no experience with Fortran, nor I'm
> needing
> > this, but anyway (perhaps just as a reminder for you) :-)...
>
> Lucky for you! ;-)
>
> > 1) Open MPI exposes MPI_LOGICAL{1|2|4|8}, and they are not (AFAIK)
> > listed in the MPI standard (I cannot found them in MPI-2.2)
>
> Mmm. Good point. Looks like we were over-zealous there.
>
> > 2) The MPI-2.2 standard DO list MPI COMPLEX4 (at least in 2.2) ...
>
> I filed https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2032 to cover both
> of these issues.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}