On Thu, 14 May 2009, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On May 14, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
>>> We actually took pains to *not* do that; we *used* to do that and
>>> took it out. :-\ IIRC, it had something to do with dlopen'ing
>> Actually, I think that was something else. Today, libopen-rte.la lists
>> libopen-pal.la as a dependency and libmpi.la lists libopen-rte.la. I had
>> removed the dependency of libmpi.la on libopen-pal.la because it was
>> causing libopen-pal.so to be listed twice by libtool, which was causing
>> It would be a trivial fix to change the Makefiles to make libmpi.la to
>> depend on libopen-pal.la as well as libopen-rte.la.
> Ah -- am I thinking of us removing libmpi (etc.) from the DSOs?
I think so. And that's a change we definitely don't want to undo.