I can do the coding - just want to ensure interested others get their
$0.002 in on how it should work.
I came up with a way to do it that doesn't require changes to the
paffinity framework. I can complete the prototype next week on an hg
branch and let you look at it. Mostly consists of moving what is now
in MPI_Init into the odls modules between the fork and exec, as Brian
On May 7, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
> Brian W. Barrett wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>> Any thoughts on this? Should we change it?
>> Yes, we should change this (IMHO) :).
> Me too.
>>> If so, who wants to be involved in the re-design? I'm pretty sure
>>> it would require some modification of the paffinity framework,
>>> plus some minor mods to the odls framework and (since you cannot
>>> bind a process other than yourself) addition of a new small
>>> "proxy" script that would bind-then-exec each process started by
>>> the orted (Eugene posted a candidate on the user list, though we
>>> will have to deal with some system-specific issues in it).
>> I can't contribute a whole lot of time, but I'd be happy to lurk,
>> offer advice, and write some small bits of code. But I definitely
>> can't lead.
>> Fist offering of opinion from me. I think we can avoid the "proxy"
>> script by doing the binding after the fork but before the exec.
>> This will definitely require minor changes to the odls and probably
>> a bunch of changes to the paffinity framework. This will make
>> things slightly less fragile than a script would, and yet get us
>> what we want.
> I'll have to talk with Len to see if Sun has any time to allocate to
> devel mailing list