On Mar 30, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Patrick Geoffray wrote:
> > performance hit on the startup time. And second, we will have to
> find a
> > pretty smart way to do this or we will completely break the memory
> > affinity stuff.
> I didn't look at the code, but I sure hope that the SM init code does
> touch each page to force allocation, otherwise there is no memory
> affinity stuff at all...
Why not? The "owning" process can do the touch; then it'll be
affinity'ed properly. Right?