Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: [OMPI devel] Meta Question -- Open MPI: Is it a dessert topping or is it a floor wax?
From: Andrew Lumsdaine (lums_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-11 13:46:09


Hi all -- There is a meta question that I think is underlying some of
the discussion about what to do with BTLs etc. Namely, is Open MPI an
MPI implementation with a portable run time system -- or is it a
distributed OS with an MPI interface? It seems like some of the
changes being asked for (e.g., with the BTLs) reflect the latter --
but perhaps not everyone shares that view and hence the impedance
mismatch.

I doubt this is the last time that tensions will come up because of
differing views on this question.

I suggest that we come to some kind of common understanding of the
question (and answer) and structure development and administration
accordingly.

Best Regards,
Andrew Lumsdaine