Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: sm Latency
From: Eugene Loh (Eugene.Loh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-21 01:36:29


Richard Graham wrote:
On 1/20/09 8:53 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres@cisco.com> wrote:
  
Eugene: you mentioned that there are other possibilities to having the
BTL understand match headers, such as a callback into the PML.  Have
you tried this approach to see what the performance cost would be,
perchance?
    
How is this different from the way matching is done today ?
  
I think it would be very similar to how matching is done today.  Again, however, trying to keep data structures to a minimum to shave latency off wherever we can.