This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:39 AM, William Hachfeld wrote:
> Can any of the OpenMPI developers speculate as to possible
> mechanisms by which the ptrace() attachment , signal handler, or
> timer registration and corresponding signal delivery could cause
> large amounts of time to be spent within the "progress" functions of
> the OpenMPI library with an apparent lack of any real progress? Any
> ideas/information would be greatly appreciated.
Hum; interesting. I can't think of any reason why that would be a
problem offhand. The mca_btl_sm_component_progress() function is the
shared memory progression function. opal_progress() and
mca_bml_r2_progress() are likely mainly dispatching off to this
Does OSS interfere with shared memory between processes in any way?
(I'm not enough of a kernel guy to know what the ramifications of
ptrace and whatnot are)