Richard Graham wrote:
> Is there any way you can quantify the cost ? This seems reasonable, but
> would be nice to get an idea what the performance cost is (and not within a
> tight loop where everything stays in cache).
Ok, I guess that would eliminate any of the simple perf tests like IMB,
netperf, and such. So do you have something else in mind, maybe HPCC?
> On 12/16/08 10:41 AM, "Terry D. Dontje" <Terry.Dontje_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> WHAT: To make predefined handles extern to pointers instead of an
>> address of an extern to a structure.
>> WHY: To make OMPI more backwards compatible in regards to changes to
>> structures that define predefined handles.
>> WHERE: In the trunk. ompi/include/mpi.h.in and places in ompi that
>> directly use the predefined handles.
>> WHEN: 01/24/2009
>> TIMEOUT: 01/10/2009
>> The point of this change is to improve the odds that an MPI application
>> does not have to recompile when changes are made to the OMPI library.
>> In this case specifically the predefined handles that use the structures
>> for communicators, groups, ops, datatypes, error handlers, win, file,
>> and info.
>> An example of the changes for the communicator predefined handles can be
>> found in the hg tmp workspace at
>> Note, the one downfall that Jeff and I could think of by doing this is
>> you potentially add one level of indirection but I believe that will be
>> a small overhead and if you use one of the predefined handles
>> repetitively (like in a loop) that the address will probably be stored
>> in a register once and no additional over should be seen due to this change.
>> devel mailing list
> devel mailing list