On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2008, at 7:15 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> > I have now also tested with 1.2.8 and r20034 works there too (for my
> > case at
> > least). So I guess that means it should be included in the 1.2
> > branch too.
> Already done:
You're working too quickly, I can't keep up ;-)
My post was meant as a data-point to back up Tims question in bug #1675
regarding the 1.2 branch.
So to sum up this bug for the mailing list archives: Fix will be in 1.2.9 and
Keep up the good work,