Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: libopen-rte --> libompi-rte
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-06 13:49:23

On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:

>> WHY: ORTE is really quite specific to OMPI. We decided long ago
>> that ORTE would not split off from OMPI, and it has been
>> specifically tailored for OMPI. Indeed, Ralph has recently been
>> expanding "ORTE" to "OMPI Run Time Environment". So let's name the
>> library what it really is.
> Does it really hurt anything to leave the name as is? I know you
> love wrapper compilers, but there are a significant number of people
> who can't use them for one reason or another (like my case, krufty
> Makefiles I don't have control over). It seems like there's almost
> no upside, and a significant downside for others.

I understand that some people can't use wrappers, but we added the --
showme options just for these kinds of scenarios. I had thought that
that was sufficient -- are you saying that it's not?

Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems