This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
Good call -- I just checked ompi/proc/proc.c and we *do* check. If
you start a heterogeneous job and we don't have support for it, we
show_help and barf.
I'll change the default tonight.
On Jun 5, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> I just noticed that heterogeneous MPI support is enabled by default.
>> Do we really want this? Doesn't it add a little overhead (probably
>> noticeable on shared memory)?
>> I'd be comfortable with users specifically having to enable
>> heterogeneous support via configure and having [slightly] better out-
>> of-the-box performance for the common (homogeneous) case.
> I think it was initially on by default because we didn't have a good
> of detecting that the job was heterogeneous when that was setup. I
> believe we do now, so it probably makes sense to change the default.
> devel mailing list