Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-21 11:57:48


Sounds perfect.

How about this -- since your and my changes are inter-dependent, can
you send me a patch for the paffinity change? I'll apply it at the
same time that I apply the new PLPA (later today).

Thanks!

On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:39 AM, Sharon Melamed wrote:

> Yes, I think we should change paffinity.h and
> paffinity_solaris_module.c and
> paffinity_windows_module.c .
>
> I added those API's some time ago based on the plpa API's. Now, the
> plpa API
> has changed and no one uses those API's. (Except me and in the
> future, maybe
> Sun guys) So I don't see why not change those API's including their
> signature in paffinity.h
>
> Sharon.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:devel-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On
> Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:19 PM
> To: Open MPI Developers
> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?
>
> On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>>> Right, but the plpa_solaris_module.c file will need to be updated
>>> with
>> the new function signatures so that it will still compile (i.e., if
>> you're going to be changing the function signatures in paffinity.h).
>
>
> Hah -- I meant paffinity_solaris_module.c. :-)
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> Cisco Systems
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems