Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] merging new PLPA to the trunk
From: Lenny Verkhovsky (lennyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-13 04:54:59


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquyres_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:34 PM
> To: Lenny Verkhovsky
> Cc: PLPA users list; Open MPI Developers; Sharon Melamed; Ralph
Castain;
> Pak Lui
> Subject: Re: merging new PLPA to the trunk
>
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
>
> > During coding new RMAPS component I found strange behavior of PLPA.
> > Same
> > behavior that was described in
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/plpa-users/2007/04/0073.php
> >
> > I believe that it was fixed in new version of PLPA.
> >
> > This new version needed to be merged to the trunk due to bug fixes
and
> > changes in API.
> >
> > If there is no objection I volunteer to do it.
>
>
> That would be great. Please use the official SVN "3rd party import"
> guidelines. There's a /vendor/plpa branch that *may* be in good shape
> for this, but may not (I don't think I fully grokked the SVN 3rd part
> import procedures when I was using that branch before). :-\ In a
> worst-cast scenario, we can "reset the clock" in the /vendor/plpa
> branch and make the new PLPA version be the "first" version in that
> tree (i.e., as if it were the first version we imported).
>
> What's your timeframe?
>
> I ask because it would probably be best if I finally get around to
> releasing a stable version of PLPA. The last version is technically
> still a beta.

We are working on the newest version from the trunk
http://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/plpa/trunk/ right now.
It's newer than /vendor/plpa branch.

>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> Cisco Systems