VT guys -- any thoughts on this?
On Feb 1, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008, at 5:35 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> These files do not belong in SVN, they are generated by aclocal:
> I think both of these have their own configure scripts, meaning that
> they were autoconfed/automaked/whatever before they were put into
> And in hindsight, this fits in with exactly what our original goal
> was: take a VT tarball and dump it into OMPI's SVN. Doh!
> So I think the question still remains: can we hook VT's autoconf (et
> al.) requirements into the top-level autogen.sh so that the trunk copy
> of vt doesn't have configure/aclocal.m4/etc. and OMPI's top-level
> autogen.sh will create them?
> Jeff Squyres
> Cisco Systems
> devel mailing list