Those pointers were perfect thanks.
It easy to see the benefit of fewer qps (per node instead of per peer)
and less consumption of resources the better but I am curious about the
actual percentage of memory footprint decrease. I am thinking that the
largest portion of the footprint comes from the fragments. Do you have
any numbers showing the actual memory footprint savings when using xrc?
Just to be clear, I am not asking for you or anyone else to generate
these numbers, but if you had them already I would be curious to know
the over all savings.
-DON
Pavel Shamis (Pasha) wrote:
> Here is paper from openib http://www.openib.org/archives/nov2007sc/XRC.pdf
> and here is mvapich presentation
> http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu/publications/ofa_nov07-mvapich-xrc.pdf
>
> Button line: XRC decrease number of QPs that ompi opens and as result
> decrease ompi's memory footprint.
> In the openib paper you may see more details about XRC. If you need more
> details about XRC implemention
> in openib blt , please let me know.
>
>
> Instead
> Don Kerr wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After searching, about the only thing I can find on xrc is what it
>> stands for, can someone explain the benefits of open mpi's use of xrc,
>> maybe point me to a paper, or both?
>>
>> TIA
>> -DON
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}