Lenny Verkhovsky wrote:
> We would like to add SDP support for OPENMPI.
> SDP can be used to accelerate job start ( oob over sdp ) and IPoIB
> performance.
I fail to see the reason to pollute the TCP btl with IB-specific SDP stuff.
For the oob, this is arguable, but doesn't SDP allow for *transparent*
socket replacement at runtime ? In this case, why not use this mechanism
and keep the code clean ?
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}