Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

From: Richard Graham (rlgraham_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-04 11:04:27


Much higher (23), but in way over-subscribed mode ...

On 11/2/07 8:07 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Did you run with a higher number of procs?
>
> -jms
> Sent from my PDA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgraham_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 04:05 PM Eastern Standard Time
> To: Open MPI Developers
> Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken
>
> It does. I was able to run the point-to-point intel tests with 3 procs
> using sm and self, ob1 and dr.
>
> Rich
>
>
> On 11/2/07 3:57 PM, "Don Kerr" <Don.Kerr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> > Rich,
>> >
>> > Do the ompi_free_list changes impact the sm btl? Solaris SPARC sm btl
>> > seems to have an issue starting with last nights put back but I have not
>> > looked into it yet.
>> >
>> > -DON
>> >
>> > Richard Graham wrote:
>> >
>>> >> R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using
>>> >> ompi_free_list_t_ex() and providing
>>> >> a memory allocator would have been bitten by this, since I did not
>>> >> update this function
>>> >> (which will be deprecated in favor of a version parallel to
>>> >> ompi_free_list_t_new) to initialize
>>> >> the new fields defined. From looking through the btls, this seems to
>>> >> be only the openib btl.
>>> >>
>>> >> Rich
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 11/2/07 12:31 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 11/2/07 12:21 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> The freelist changes from yesterday appear to have broken the
>>> >> openib
>>> >> btl. We didn't get lots of test failures in MTT last night only
>>> >> because there was a separate (unrelated) typo in the ofud BTL
>>> >> that
>>> >> prevented the nightly tarball from building on any IB-capable
>>> >> machines. :-)
>>> >>
>>> >> Rich hopes to look into fixing the openib BTL problem today; he
>>> >> thinks it's a case of a simple oversight: the openib BTL is
>>> >> not using
>>> >> the new freelist init functions.
>>> >>
>>> >> Rich: are there other places that are not using the new init
>>> >> functions that need to?
>>> >>
>>>>> >>>> the ompi free list has two init functions, I changed just
>>> >> one. The IB btl uses the
>>>>> >>>> one I have not yet changed, but the pml uses the one I did
>>> >> change.
>>> >>
>>>>> >>>> rich
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Jeff Squyres
>>> >> Cisco Systems
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> devel mailing list
>>> >> devel_at_[hidden]
>>> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> devel mailing list
>>> >> devel_at_[hidden]
>>> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> devel mailing list
>>> >> devel_at_[hidden]
>>> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> >>
>>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list
>> > devel_at_[hidden]
>> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel