Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-02 20:07:33


Did you run with a higher number of procs?

-jms
Sent from my PDA

 -----Original Message-----
From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgraham_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 04:05 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

It does. I was able to run the point-to-point intel tests with 3 procs
using sm and self, ob1 and dr.

Rich

On 11/2/07 3:57 PM, "Don Kerr" <Don.Kerr_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Rich,
>
> Do the ompi_free_list changes impact the sm btl? Solaris SPARC sm btl
> seems to have an issue starting with last nights put back but I have not
> looked into it yet.
>
> -DON
>
> Richard Graham wrote:
>
>> R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using
>> ompi_free_list_t_ex() and providing
>> a memory allocator would have been bitten by this, since I did not
>> update this function
>> (which will be deprecated in favor of a version parallel to
>> ompi_free_list_t_new) to initialize
>> the new fields defined. From looking through the btls, this seems to
>> be only the openib btl.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> On 11/2/07 12:31 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/2/07 12:21 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> The freelist changes from yesterday appear to have broken the
>> openib
>> btl. We didn't get lots of test failures in MTT last night only
>> because there was a separate (unrelated) typo in the ofud BTL
>> that
>> prevented the nightly tarball from building on any IB-capable
>> machines. :-)
>>
>> Rich hopes to look into fixing the openib BTL problem today; he
>> thinks it's a case of a simple oversight: the openib BTL is
>> not using
>> the new freelist init functions.
>>
>> Rich: are there other places that are not using the new init
>> functions that need to?
>>
>>>> the ompi free list has two init functions, I changed just
>> one. The IB btl uses the
>>>> one I have not yet changed, but the pml uses the one I did
>> change.
>>
>>>> rich
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> Cisco Systems
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel_at_[hidden]
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel