Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-02 20:07:33


Did you run with a higher number of procs?

-jms
Sent from my PDA

 -----Original Message-----
From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgraham_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 04:05 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

It does. I was able to run the point-to-point intel tests with 3 procs
using sm and self, ob1 and dr.

Rich

On 11/2/07 3:57 PM, "Don Kerr" <Don.Kerr_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Rich,
>
> Do the ompi_free_list changes impact the sm btl? Solaris SPARC sm btl
> seems to have an issue starting with last nights put back but I have not
> looked into it yet.
>
> -DON
>
> Richard Graham wrote:
>
>> R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using
>> ompi_free_list_t_ex() and providing
>> a memory allocator would have been bitten by this, since I did not
>> update this function
>> (which will be deprecated in favor of a version parallel to
>> ompi_free_list_t_new) to initialize
>> the new fields defined. From looking through the btls, this seems to
>> be only the openib btl.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> On 11/2/07 12:31 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/2/07 12:21 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> The freelist changes from yesterday appear to have broken the
>> openib
>> btl. We didn't get lots of test failures in MTT last night only
>> because there was a separate (unrelated) typo in the ofud BTL
>> that
>> prevented the nightly tarball from building on any IB-capable
>> machines. :-)
>>
>> Rich hopes to look into fixing the openib BTL problem today; he
>> thinks it's a case of a simple oversight: the openib BTL is
>> not using
>> the new freelist init functions.
>>
>> Rich: are there other places that are not using the new init
>> functions that need to?
>>
>>>> the ompi free list has two init functions, I changed just
>> one. The IB btl uses the
>>>> one I have not yet changed, but the pml uses the one I did
>> change.
>>
>>>> rich
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> Cisco Systems
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel_at_[hidden]
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel