Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-02 15:26:49


Rich -

I'm not 100% sure its fixed - I'm still seeing "out of memory" errors when running about 40 prob imb over openib. But I ran out of time to investigate deeply...

Could you try running a nontrivial omb to check?

-jms
Sent from my PDA

 -----Original Message-----
From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgraham_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 02:07 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using ompi_free_list_t_ex()
and providing
 a memory allocator would have been bitten by this, since I did not update
this function
 (which will be deprecated in favor of a version parallel to
ompi_free_list_t_new) to initialize
 the new fields defined. From looking through the btls, this seems to be
only the openib btl.

Rich

On 11/2/07 12:31 PM, "Richard Graham" <rlgraham_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 11/2/07 12:21 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> The freelist changes from yesterday appear to have broken the openib
>> btl. We didn't get lots of test failures in MTT last night only
>> because there was a separate (unrelated) typo in the ofud BTL that
>> prevented the nightly tarball from building on any IB-capable
>> machines. :-)
>>
>> Rich hopes to look into fixing the openib BTL problem today; he
>> thinks it's a case of a simple oversight: the openib BTL is not using
>> the new freelist init functions.
>>
>> Rich: are there other places that are not using the new init
>> functions that need to?
>>
>>>> >> the ompi free list has two init functions, I changed just one. The IB
>>>> btl uses the
>>>> >> one I have not yet changed, but the pml uses the one I did change.
>>
>>>> >> rich
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> Cisco Systems
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel