On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Andrew Friedley wrote:
> Tim Prins wrote:
>> I am working on implementing the RSL. Part of this is changing the
>> to use the process attribute system in the RSL. I had designed this
>> system to to include a non-blocking interface.
>> However, I have looked again and noticed that nobody is using the
>> non-blocking modex receive. Because of this I am inclined to not have
>> such an interface in the RSL.
> hmm, would using a non-blocking modex recv improve performance in any
> way, or have any other useful impacts? If so, I would use it.
No, no performance advantages.
It was originally intended to allow a BTL to subscribe to modex
information for a peer, and receive updates when that peer's
information changed (say, a NIC died mid-run or was restarted mid-
run). Clearly, we haven't gone down that path at this time.