Tim Prins wrote:
> I am working on implementing the RSL. Part of this is changing the modex
> to use the process attribute system in the RSL. I had designed this
> system to to include a non-blocking interface.
> However, I have looked again and noticed that nobody is using the
> non-blocking modex receive. Because of this I am inclined to not have
> such an interface in the RSL.
hmm, would using a non-blocking modex recv improve performance in any
way, or have any other useful impacts? If so, I would use it.