Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-06 15:34:00

On Oct 6, 2007, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Friedley wrote:

> Yeah so the HCA querying/selecting will be good to have separate, as
> well as PD/registration stuff -- for example I copied the mpool rdma
> callback functions verbatim from the OpenIB BTL to the UD BTL. I
> don't
> think QP creation is worth sharing, nor any of the connection
> establishment stuff.


> Which reminds me, can we rename the OpenIB BTL to 'ofrc' as
> discussed on
> a call a long time ago? I will do the work if it's cool with
> everyone.

Can we wait until we bring the common/of stuff back from the tmp
branch? It'll make the changes to the openib BTL significantly
easier to merge.

I don't know Torsten's/Gleb's timeframe for moving everything to
common/of -- my job was to provide the skeleton and I did so. :-)

> Do we care about backwards compatibility of the openib name? I
> might
> need help doing that, but shouldn't be a big deal.

Yes, I very much care about backward compatibility of the openib name
and MCA parameters... This is, as I see it, the biggest issue with
changing the name. Stuff like this has to work:

        mpirun --mca btl openib,self ...
        mpirun --mca btl_openib_foo 32 ...

Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems