Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Gleb Natapov (glebn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-06 09:00:06

On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:50:43AM -0600, Ralph H Castain wrote:
> WHAT: Decide upon how to handle MPI applications where one or more
> processes exit without calling MPI_Finalize
> WHY: Some applications can abort via an exit call instead of
> calling MPI_Abort when a library (or something else) calls
> exit. This situation is outside a user's control, so they
> cannot fix it.
> WHERE: Refer to ticket #1144 - code changes are TBD
> WHEN: Up to the group
> Does the general community feel we should do anything here, or is this a
> "bug" that should be fixed by the entity calling "exit"? I should note that
> it actually is bad behavior (IMHO) for any library to call "exit" - but
> then, we do that in some situations too, so perhaps we shouldn't cast
> stones!
> Any suggested solutions or comments on whether or not we should do anything
> would be appreciated.
IMO (a) should be implemented.