On Jun 27, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> Btw, did you compare my patch with yours on your multi-NIC system ?
>> With my patch on our system with 3 networks (2*1Gbs and one 100 Mbs)
>> I'm close to 99% of the total bandwidth. I'll try to see what I get
>> with yours.
> Your patch SEGV on my setup. So can check and compare. I see this in
> your patch:
> + reg = recvreq->req_rdma[bml_btl->btl_index].btl_reg;
> But bml_btl->btl_index is not an index in req_rdma array and
> actually we
> never initialize bml_btl->btl_index at all, so may be it would be a
> idea to remove this field at all. TCP never use reg so no problem
> but for IB it should be valid.
My patch is so old I don't remember. I was quite sure that in the
beginning I copy and paste from the other function, the one that
don't take the BTL as an argument. If you replace in the faulty line
bml_btl->btl_index by recvreq->req_rdma_idx that should work again.
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s