Are people available today to discuss this over the phone?
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:11:12AM -0400, George Bosilca wrote:
>> ) I expect you to revise the patch in order to propose a generic
>> solution or I'll trigger a vote against the patch. I vote to be
>> backed out of the trunk as it export way to much knowledge from the
>> Open IB BTL into the PML layer.
> The patch solves real problem. If we want to back it out we need to
> another solution. I also didn't like this change too much, but I
> about other solutions and haven't found something better that what
> Galen did. If you have something in mind lets discuss it.
> As a general comment this kind of discussion is why I prefer to send
> significant changes as a patch to the list for discussion before
>> PS: With Gleb changes the problem is the same. The following snippet
>> reflect exactly the same behavior as the original patch.
> I didn't try to change the semantic. Just make the code to match the
> semantic that Galen described.
> devel mailing list