On 5/1/07 7:43 AM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>>> BTL). It's not that I don't care about IPv6, it's just that I care
>>> more about multi TCP BTL working in the way it is supposed to work.
>> There'd be less trouble if we all had automatic testing, so nobody
>> breaks stuff somebody else relies on.
> We actually do -- I'm guessing no one has spoken to you about
> MTT...? (The MPI Testing Tool) Read the users's section to see how
> to get started:
I'm not entirely sure that the MTT testing would (a) detect whether or not
multiple TCP BTL paths were working (as opposed to only one); or (b) that
IPv6 was correctly operating...which were the two issues in this discussion.
Having access to specific tests for specific functionality would be very