Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

From: Ralph H Castain (rhc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-17 08:50:29


Thanks Christian.

Actually, I was aware of that and should have clarified that these tests did
*not* involve the IPv6 code.

Ralph

On 4/17/07 1:31 AM, "Christian Kauhaus" <ckauhaus_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Ralph H Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]>:
>> even though the HNP isn't actually part of the MPI job itself, or the
>> processes are opening duplicate OOB sockets back to the HNP. I am not
>> certain which (or either) of these is the root cause, however - it needs
>> further investigation to identify the source of the extra sockets.
>
> If you are using the IPv6-ready code: in this case we need to create two
> sockets for each OOB/TCP. One uses AF_INET and one uses AF_INET6.
> IIRC, we close the superfluous socket once the connection attempt on
> either one succeeds. Adrian, correct me if I'm wrong. :-)
> Unfortunately, there's no easy way around this.
>
> Christian