On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:10 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> It's already in the 1.2 !!! I don't know much you care about
> performance, but I do. This patch increase by 10% the latency. It
> might be correct for the pathscale compiler, but it didn't look as a
> huge requirement for all others compilers. A memory barrier for an
> initialization and an unlock definitively looks like killing an ant
> with a nuclear strike.
Can we roll this back and find some other way?
--
Jeff Squyres
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}