This error is usually happens when libibverbs is dlopened without
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 03:05:39PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Open MPI wrote on Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 01:00:00PM CEST:
> > #334: Building with Libtool 2.1a fails to run OpenIB BTL
> > Are you testing uninstalled or installed programs/libraries?
> > Installed.
> > If you are testing an uninstalled program: does libtool generate a shell
> > wrapper for it? If yes: post the two shell wrappers generated by 1.5.22
> > and HEAD.
> > I was testing with a trivial "hello world" MPI application; i.e., one that
> > I had compiled with mpicc and was running with "mpirun -np 2 --mca btl
> > openib hello". Hence, I was testing against installed trees of Open MPI.
> > I took care to "rm -rf" the installation tree before testing each so that
> > there would be no kruft left from prior installs.
> OK, I can only assume that with 1.5.22, some code links against
> libibverbs, or loads it earlier at runtime, so that the symbol is
> present. In any case I wonder why mthca.so isn't linked directly
> against libibverbs (maybe useful to suggest that to upstream).
> To find out the culprit, here's a couple of quick (well) ways:
> diff build-with-lt1.5/Makefile build-with-lt2.1a/Makefile
> and look for differences in library link variables. Otherwise, the
> config.log outputs should give clues.
> To give you some more hints for possible causes: ompi_info could have a
> different set of RPATH entries, or different NEEDED libraries than your
> test executable; if any of those cause libibverbs.so to be loaded, then
> the symbol would be visible already. Maybe your test executables even
> have different RPATHs or NEEDED libs (find out with 'objdump -p' and
> > I've attached 2 tarballs to the bug (you have to go to the URL of the bug
> > to get them; they are not included in the mails):
> If there are tarballs available at
> http://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/334, then I'm too blind to find
> them. Would that be elsewhere?
> > * One with all the configure output and the wrapper script for ompi_info.
> > Note that ompi_info -- which lt_dlopen()'s the OpenIB BTL -- does not show
> > the same problem (i.e., the OpenIB BTL opens properly and ompi_info shows
> > its information). This happens with both the uninstalled and installed
> > ompi_info.
> > * Another with the same for 2.1a.
> That would be very helpful.
> devel mailing list