* Brian Barrett wrote on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 11:53:41PM CET:
> Ralf, I was wondering if you could take a look at what I actually
> committed (r8779) and let me know what you think. It's mostly your
> patch, but I rewrote a good chunk of the m4 macro to take better
> advantage of m4 and ditch all the extra variables that get eval'ed at
> the end so that a prefix can be passed. We never pass in anything
> other than a literal, so there's no problems with that. Seems to be
> a lot shorter, although slightly more complicated to understand.
Yes, much nicer indeed. Seems fine to me.
I'd appreciate my name being spelled correctly, though.
A mostly unrelated question, to fulfill this: ;-)
> It's the thread that never ends... :)
Which systems' m4 is capable of translating the configury but does not
ignore unquoted [eval]? (See comment in ompi_get_version.m4.)