Subject: Re: [MTT users] To run MTT on our cluster
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-10 19:23:48
On Jun 10, 2014, at 7:19 PM, Ralph Castain <rhc_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I had a chance to think about this some more, and I'm wondering if this falls into some new category of "member". Personally, I would really welcome getting the MTT results from another site as it would expand coverage of various environments, something we are beginning to lack. So even if Jaison et al aren't going to contribute code, contributing test result data is a valuable contribution in itself.
>
> I think this fits to your question about testing nightly OMPI tarballs. If Jaison can run tests with our tarballs and tell us the results, and that meets his needs to characterize/validate their cluster, then it seems like both sides win.
FWIW, this is already an existing definition of "member" (run tests only). That's what I was thinking when I asked whether they planned to test nightly tarballs (assumedly vs. just validating their cluster with release tarballs).
-- Jeff Squyres jsquyres_at_[hidden] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/