From: George Bosilca (bosilca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-03 12:07:33
The MPI part is now solved (starting from revision 14202). The
problem was the way we compute the true_lb and true_ub. This didn't
affect us before simply because we didn't use this feature.
george.
On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:25 PM, Tim Mattox wrote:
> Hi All,
> I just checked the recent nightly MTT results and found two things
> of note,
> one for the MTT community, the other for the OMPI developers.
>
> For both, see http://www.open-mpi.org/mtt/reporter.php?do_redir=143
> for details of the failed MTT tests with the OMPI trunk at r14180.
>
> 1) For MTT developers:
> The MTT intel test suite is incorrectly seeing a failed
> MPI_Allgatherv_f
> test as passed, yet is correctly detecting that the MPI_Allgatherv_c
> test is failing.
> The STDOUT from "passed" MPI_Allgatherv_f seems to indicate that
> the tests
> actually failed in a similar way to the _c version, but MTT thinks
> it passed.
> I've not had time to diagnose why MTT is missing this... anyone
> else have
> some spare cycles to look at this?
>
> 2) For OMPI developers:
> The MPI_Allgatherv_* tests are failing as of r14180 in all test
> conditions
> on the IU machines, and others, yet this passed the night before on
> r14172.
>
> Looking at the svn log for r#'s r14173 thru r14180, I can narrow it
> down to
> one of these changes as the culprit:
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/14180
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/14179
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/14174 (Not likely)
>
> My money is on the much larger r14180 changeset.
> The other r#'s aren't culprits for obvious reasons.
> --
> Tim Mattox - http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/
> tmattox_at_[hidden] || timattox_at_[hidden]
> I'm a bright... http://www.the-brights.net/
> _______________________________________________
> devel-core mailing list
> devel-core_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel-core